Why do women want to talk to me on Skype but when I say I don't have Skype they stop talking to me?

They probably want to see if you're a real or fake profile. Idk what female that I know of who would just automatically give their number unless they have the guys Facebook and seeing if he's real or webcam.

thadeusz wrote:

nanox wrote: So what you're saying is the best way to find out what a woman is thinking is to ask her instead of a bunch of guys on an internet forum?
That sounds direct, honest and lacking in the appropriate amount of game playing.

Are you implying, im sneaky, dishonest and manipulative? If yes, then you have a very indirect way of stating that.And what games am I playing?

Stupid remark of yours. Can't believe it received two "Thank You"s. WTF.

That comment was thanked because it's saying it's better to ask the women themselves instead of a bunch of strangers on a forum. People on the forum can only speculate, and let's face it, most of the guys here would give you some game-talk/psychobabble, pretending to be 'love gurus' or experts of the female mind.

What I got from that post was that asking a bunch of dudes about this issue will give you the dating equivalent of "bro-science".. that is, speculation that could be furthest from the truth. I personally didnt detect any personal attacks directed at you from her post.

So basically ask the ones who stopped talking to you, they'll know the reason better than anyone else.

thadeusz wrote: I do wish those who are in charge of this website change their mind and allow me to become admin. One of the first things I’d implement is a blocking feature that would hide those posts from users I blocked. Also an anonymous feature so my questions aren’t met with bias.

Ha.
I enjoy how all your reasoning is to be in your favor.
Great way to advocate yourself for modship.
I hope they never change their mind.

Tiffanoodles wrote:

thadeusz wrote: I do wish those who are in charge of this website change their mind and allow me to become admin. One of the first things I’d implement is a blocking feature that would hide those posts from users I blocked. Also an anonymous feature so my questions aren’t met with bias.

Ha.
I enjoy how all your reasoning is to be in your favor.
Great way to advocate yourself for modship.
I hope they never change their mind.

criticism is too mainstream

this is same thing as WHY MENS/GUYS WANT TALK TO ME ON SKYPE......

thadeusz wrote:

tobybear wrote: And, like I said. It was where my mind immediately led & know it's not necessarily true; just being honest.

From the other posts I’ve read so far, yours are among those I appreciate the most. This one however is such of low quality, since it’s tendentious, based on false assumptions, and is basically pointless.

Apology accepted.

xarthurx wrote: no the real reason is due to fear of him for only having HALF the face. but worry no more....hes now a new man reborn with a full face. thaeduz go get em son!

I do wish those who are in charge of this website change their mind and allow me to become admin. One of the first things I’d implement is a blocking feature that would hide those posts from users I blocked. Also an anonymous feature so my questions aren’t met with bias.

Also, xarthurx, please take off my picture from your avatar. I don't want to bother the mods to do that. Thank you.

that makes no sense at all.
you officially disqualified yourself, you know that?
and why do you have to be so passive aggressive?
for the sake of it, we re all in the same boat, man. relax.
why would you block users who arent even interested in being blocked by you?
quit the drama, we re all grown ups here.
we can talk about it. i dont have a problem with you.
your questions and answers are just a bit strange sometimes.
its hard to understand what you want sometimes.
im not even joking, cause this is getting ridiculous!
seriously.

Tiffanoodles wrote:

thadeusz wrote: I do wish those who are in charge of this website change their mind and allow me to become admin. One of the first things I’d implement is a blocking feature that would hide those posts from users I blocked. Also an anonymous feature so my questions aren’t met with bias.

Ha.
I enjoy how all your reasoning is to be in your favor.
Great way to advocate yourself for modship.
I hope they never change their mind.

He's not saying he'll control post filtering for everyone, he's saying there should be a way to put people on a personal ignore list so you don't see their attempts to flame or troll you.

It's a legitimate request - many forums have this feature.

Chill wrote:

Tiffanoodles wrote:

thadeusz wrote: I do wish those who are in charge of this website change their mind and allow me to become admin. One of the first things I’d implement is a blocking feature that would hide those posts from users I blocked. Also an anonymous feature so my questions aren’t met with bias.

Ha.
I enjoy how all your reasoning is to be in your favor.
Great way to advocate yourself for modship.
I hope they never change their mind.

He's not saying he'll control post filtering for everyone, he's saying there should be a way to put people on a personal ignore list so you don't see their attempts to flame or troll you.

It's a legitimate request - many forums have this feature.

why would that even be necessary?
if you see a name of a user you dont like, you dont read their post. piece of cake, isnt it?
or is it too tempting?
on the other hand, you cant deal with something somebody wrote on the internet?
give me a break.

San_Ichiban wrote:

Chill wrote:
He's not saying he'll control post filtering for everyone, he's saying there should be a way to put people on a personal ignore list so you don't see their attempts to flame or troll you.

It's a legitimate request - many forums have this feature.

why would that even be necessary?
if you see a name of a user you dont like, you dont read it. piece of cake, isnt it?
or is it too tempting?
on the other hand, you cant deal with something somebody wrote on the internet?
give me a break.

Calm down. Just because you don't see the need for a feature, doesn't mean it's not useful for others.

Chill wrote:

San_Ichiban wrote:

Chill wrote:
He's not saying he'll control post filtering for everyone, he's saying there should be a way to put people on a personal ignore list so you don't see their attempts to flame or troll you.

It's a legitimate request - many forums have this feature.

why would that even be necessary?
if you see a name of a user you dont like, you dont read it. piece of cake, isnt it?
or is it too tempting?
on the other hand, you cant deal with something somebody wrote on the internet?
give me a break.

Calm down. Just because you don't see the need for a feature, doesn't mean it's not useful for others.

see, and thats the point:
i am calm.
i couldnt care less. im just asking. this is my opinion though and the way i express it.
and THIS is the reason why ppl are missunderstood.
because
we re all behind our lovely screens and not face to face.